Huia
Heteralocha acutirostris
Passeriformes - Callaeidae - Heteralocha
The Huia was a species of songbird native to New Zealand’s North Island, which went extinct in the early 20th century. DNA sequencing has revealed that the Huia, together with its two close relatives, the Kokako (Callaeas) and the Saddleback (Philesturnus), all of which are New Zealand wattlebirds, belongs to an earlier branch of the songbird evolutionary tree. These species together form a distinct monophyletic group, separate from the Passerida and Core Corvoidea suborders. The ancestors of this monophyletic group may have migrated to New Zealand via “stepping-stone” islands, assisted by the westerly winds that formed when Australia and Antarctica separated in the late Eocene. 1 It was previously thought that either the Huia or the Kokako might have been the earliest to diverge from this monophyletic group of New Zealand wattlebirds. More recent research has found that the common ancestor of the three New Zealand wattlebird species emerged around 6.8 million years ago during the late Miocene. The Kokako was the first to diverge, while the Huia and Saddleback formed a sister group, with their divergence occurring approximately 4.8 million years ago during the early Pliocene. 2
The Huia, measuring about 48 cm in length, was the largest species in the Callaeidae family. Its plumage was predominantly black with a slight dark blue sheen, except for a distinctive white band at the tips of the tail feathers. On either side of its face, near the tip of the beak, the Huia had prominent, round, orange wattles. Both sexes had white beaks with gray bases, but there was a significant difference in their shapes: the male’s beak was short and stout, while the female’s was long, slender, and had a pronounced downward curve.
The Huia primarily fed on insects that infested decaying wood, particularly the larvae of the Huhu beetle, which is native to New Zealand. Early explanations suggested that the significant difference in beak appearance between males and females likely facilitated cooperative foraging, with the male using his short, sturdy beak to chisel open the wood and the female using her long, slender beak to extract the insects. However, despite this phenomenon, the relationship between the sexes was not truly “cooperative.” 3 Instead, the evolution of different beak shapes was more about reducing intraspecific competition, as it allowed the sexes to exploit different food sources.4 They were often observed in pairs, exhibiting strong bonds, believed to have formed lifelong mating pairs. Occasionally, they were seen in small groups of four or more. 5 Nesting occurred in October, with eggs hatching by November, typically producing a clutch of 1 to 5 eggs. The Huia’s migratory behavior is unclear; while there is speculation that they bred in higher altitudes and wintered at lower elevations, the general consensus is that they were non-migratory. 6 Their recognizable call is a soft whistle, like their name. They are attracted to this sound, and Māori hunters take advantage of this by mimicking the sound to trap them.
The Huia was restricted to specific areas of New Zealand’s North Island, particularly in the southern mountains and forests. Fossil records indicate that they once had a broader distribution across the North Island, but their range was reduced due to the settlement of the Maori. The arrival of Europeans in the 19th century exacerbated the situation, leading to a dramatic population decline in the latter half of the century. This decline was primarily driven by extensive deforestation, as vast tracts of native forest, which provided the decaying wood that was essential to the Huia’s specialized diet, were cleared for agriculture. Additionally, commercial hunting targeted the Huia for its striking beak and tail feathers. Before European contact, the Maori also hunted Huia, using the birds to create valuable ornaments. However, a balance was maintained due to hunting restrictions and the bird’s sacred status in Maori culture, preventing the species from being driven to extinction. This balance was disrupted by the economic pressures introduced by European settlers, leading to the species’ eventual extinction.
The last confirmed sighting of the Huia occurred on December 28, 1907, near the Tararua Range, when W.W. Smith reported seeing two male birds and one female. However, there is some debate regarding the exact date of this sighting, with existing literature suggesting that it may have taken place sometime between 1905 and 1907. 7 In the 1920s, there were a series of unverified reports of Huia sightings, with sporadic, unconfirmed records even continuing as late as 1961. 8

Buller, Walter Lawry. A History of the Birds of New Zealand, Volume 1 (2nd ed.). London: Self-published, pp. 1888.
-
Earlier estimates suggested that they began diverging between 34 and 39 million years ago, which is slightly earlier than the more precise molecular dating results currently available. The latest findings in (Gibb, 2022) indicate that the divergence of hihi (Notiomystidae) from the Callaeidae occurred during the early Miocene, around 19 to 21 million years ago. See: Shepherd, Lara D., and David M. Lambert. “The relationships and origins of the New Zealand wattlebirds (Passeriformes, Callaeatidae) from DNA sequence analyses.” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43.2 (2007): 480-492. ↩︎
-
Gibb, Gillian C., and Lara D. Shepherd. “Recent evolution of extreme sexual dimorphism in the huia (Heteralocha acutirostris; Callaeidae).” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 175 (2022): 107575. ↩︎
-
This narrative of “cooperation” primarily originates from Buller’s 1888 account, although he personally opposed this interpretation. Furthermore, this beak dimorphism is not unique to the Huia; it is simply most pronounced in this species. For further reference, see: Jamieson, I. G., and H. G. Spencer. “The bill and foraging behaviour of the Huia (Heteralocha acutirostris): Were they unique?.” Notornis 43 (1996): 14-48. ↩︎
-
Moorhouse, R. J. “The extraordinary bill dimorphism of the Huia (Heteralocha acutirostris): sexual selection or intersexual competition?.” Notornis 43 (1996): 19-34. ↩︎
-
Buller, Walter Lawry. A history of the birds of New Zealand. Vol. 1. The Author, 1888. ↩︎
-
Higgins, P. J., & Peter, J. M. (2006). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. vol. 7, boatbill to Starlings. Oxford University Press. ↩︎
-
Galbreath, Ross. “The 1907 ‘last generally accepted record’of huia (Heteralocha acutirostris) is unreliable.” Notornis 64 (2017): 239-242. ↩︎
-
W. J. Phillipps. The Book of the Huia. Whitcombe & Tombs, Christchurch. 1963. Cited in (Higgins, 2006). ↩︎